| HUM 270 |
"The
Use & Abuse of Experience for Theory" |
John H.
Smith |
"Experience"
plays a central, ambivalent, and politically charged role--explicitly
or implicitly—in theoretical debates in all humanistic
disciplines. Joan Scott writes at the conclusion of
her essay, "The Evidence of Experience":
"Experience is at once always already an interpretation
and something that needs to be interpreted. What counts
as experience is neither self-evident nor straightforward;
it is always contested, and always therefore political.
The study of experience, therefore, must call into question
its originary status in historical explanation....Experience
is, in this approach, not the origin of our explanation,
but that which we want to explain." The goal
of this seminar is to explore a variety of philosophical
positions on "experience" (empirical, Kant, Hegelian,
phenomenological, pragmatic, hermeneutic) and a variety
of discursive-theoretical spheres in which it is employed
and criticized (identity politics, feminist standpoint theory,
"situated knowledges," Critical Race Theory, gay/lesbian
studies, queer theory). Readings by (the likes of):
Bacon, Kant, Hegel, Dilthey, Heidegger, Peirce, Merleau-Ponty,
Gadamer, Hartsock, Haraway, Patricia Williams, Spivak, Butler).
NOTE: For the first meeting, students should read
Joan Scott's essay (anthologized, among other places, in
the Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader).